Current status on clinical performance and main failures of laminate veneers: a review of the literature

Authors

  • Giovanna Gioppo Correa Federal University of Santa Maria
  • Isadora Fontes Pereira Federal University of Santa Maria
  • Ana Luisa da Silva Gauger Federal University of Santa Maria
  • Letícia Bohn Jung Federal University of Santa Maria
  • Alan Pedro Valduga Federal University of Santa Maria
  • Luciano de Souza Gonçalves Federal University of Santa Maria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0397-2895

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i3.12142

Keywords:

Dental Laminates, Dental Veneers, Cosmetic Dentistry

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to identify the survival rate and cause of failure of ceramic laminate veneers. Methods: An active search of the last five years (2015 – 2020) was carried out in the United States National Library of Medicine (pubmed.ncbi.nih.gov) the MEDLINE database, in English, using the descriptors: Laminate Veneers, Porcelain Laminate Veneers and Ceramic Laminate Veneers, which resulted in 35 papers. After reading the abstracts, 9 studies that evaluated ceramic laminates that were not produced using felspathic porcelain, leucite-reinforced glass-ceramicc, or lithium disilicate glass-ceramic were
excluded. Twenty-six scientific papers were selected,categorized as: Case reports, clinical studies, in vitro studies and literature reviews. Result: The studies showed survival rates between 100% after two years of cementation up to values above 80% after 14 years. The three causes of failure identified were: marginal misfit (37%), pigmentation of the margins (30%), and fracture or chipping of the restorations (3%). Final Considerations: Within the limitations of this study, it was possible to conclude that the leading causes of failure are associated with the restoration’s margins. However, ceramiclaminates can achieve high survival rates even 14 years after cementation, showing a high-reliability level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. de Siqueira F, Cardenas A, Gruber YL, Kose C, Pupo YM, Gomes
GM, et al. Using CAD/CAM-Modified Correlation Mode
to Produce Laminate Veneers: A Six-Month Case Report.
Oper Dent 2017; 42(5):E139-e47.
2. Morita RK, Hayashida MF, Pupo YM, Berger G, Reggiani
RD, Betiol EA. Minimally Invasive Laminate Veneers: Clinical
Aspects in Treatment Planning and Cementation Procedures.
Case Rep Dent 2016; 2016:1839793.
3. Tuzzolo Neto H, do Nascimento WF, Erly L, Ribeiro RA,
Barbosa JS, Zambrana JM, et al. Laminated Veneers with
Stratified Feldspathic Ceramics. Case Rep Dent 2018;
2018:5368939.
4. Silva G, Normandes AC, Barros Júnior E, Gatti J, Maranhão
K, Reis AC, et al. Ceramic Laminate Veneers for Reestablishment
of Esthetics in Case of Lateral Incisor Agenesis. Case
Rep Dent 2018; 2018:4764575.
5. Sá TCM, de Carvalho MFF, de Sá JCM, Magalhães CS,
Moreira AN, Yamauti M. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior
teeth with different thicknesses of porcelain laminate
veneers: an 8-year follow-up clinical evaluation. Eur J Dent
2018; 12(4):590-3.
6. Marchionatti AME, Wandscher VF, May MM, Bottino MA,
May LG. Color stability of ceramic laminate veneers cemented
with light-polymerizing and dual-polymerizing luting
agent: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Prosthet
Dent 2017; 118(5):604-10.
7. Rinke S, Bettenhäuser-Hartung L, Leha A, Rödiger M,
Schmalz G, Ziebolz D. Retrospective evaluation of extended
glass-ceramic ceramic laminate veneers after a mean observational
period of 10 years. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;
32(5):487-95.
8. Yuce M, Ulusoy M, Turk AG. Comparison of Marginal and
Internal Adaptation of Heat-Pressed and CAD/CAM Porcelain
Laminate Veneers and a 2-Year Follow-Up. J Prosthodont
2019; 28(5):504-10.
9. KaragözoÄŸlu İ, Toksavul S, Toman M. 3D quantification of
clinical marginal and internal gap of porcelain laminate veneers
with minimal and without tooth preparation and 2-year
clinical evaluation. Quintessence Int 2016; 47(6):461-71.
10. Nejatidanesh F, Savabi G, Amjadi M, Abbasi M, Savabi O.
Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/
CAM ceramic laminate veneers - a retrospective study. J
Prosthodont Res 2018; 62(4):462-7.
11. Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Özcan M. Effect of immediate
and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength,
failure type and Weilbull characteristics of lithiumdisilicate
laminate veneers. Dent Mater 2016; 32(4):e73-81.
12. Arif R, Dennison JB, Garcia D, Yaman P. Gingival Health of
Porcelain Laminate Veneered Teeth: A Retrospective Assessment.
Oper Dent 2019; 44(5):452-8.
13. Arif R, Dennison JB, Garcia D, Yaman P. Retrospective
evaluation of the clinical performance and longevity of porcelain
laminate veneers 7 to 14 years after cementation. J
Prosthet Dent 2019; 122(1):31-7.
14. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Jansen K, van der Made SAM,
Özcan M. Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite
and ceramic laminate veneers: Up to 10-year findings. J
Dent 2019; 86:102-9.
15. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Schuitemaker J, van der Made
SAM, Meisberger EW, Magne P, et al. Performance of ceramic
laminate veneers with immediate dentine sealing: An 11 year
prospective clinical trial. Dent Mater 2019; 35(7):1042-52.
16. TuÄŸcu E, VanlıoÄŸlu B, Özkan YK, Aslan YU. Marginal Adaptation
and Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Laminate
Veneers on Teeth with Different Preparation Depths.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018; 38(Suppl):s87-s95.
17. Gresnigt MMM, Özcan M, Carvalho M, Lazari P, Cune MS,
Razavi P, et al. Effect of luting agent on the load to failure
and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate
veneers. Dent Mater 2017; 33(12):1392-401.
18. Viswambaran M, Londhe SM, Kumar V. Conservative and
esthetic management of diastema closure using porcelain laminate
veneers. Med J Armed Forces India 2015; 71(Suppl
2):S581-5.
19. Kermanshah H, Valizadeh S. A 7-Year Follow-up of a Fractured
Endodontically Treated Incisor Restored with a One-
-Piece Post and Core Laminate Veneer. Front Dent 2019;
16(3):224-30.
20. Aslan YU, Uludamar A, Özkan Y. Retrospective Analysis
of Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneers Applied by Experienced
Dentists: 10-Year Results. Int J Prosthodont 2019;
32(6):471-4.
21. Lee SM, Choi YS. Effect of ceramic material and resin cement
systems on the color stability of laminate veneers after
accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120(1):99-106.
22. Haralur SB. Microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers cemented
with different bonding techniques. J Clin Exp Dent
2018; 10(2):e166-e71.
23. Romanini-Junior JC, Hirata R, Bonfante EA, Bordin D, Kumagai
RY, Fardin VP, et al. Monolithic CAD/CAM laminate
veneers: Reliability and failure modes. Dent Mater 2020;
36(6):724-32.
24. Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM.
Main Clinical Outcomes of Feldspathic Porcelain and Glass-
Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis of Survival and Complication Rates. Int J Prosthodont
2016; 29(1):38-49.
25. Alothman Y, Bamasoud MS. The Success of Dental Veneers
According To Preparation Design and Material Type. Open
Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6(12):2402-8.
26. Liu M, Gai K, Chen J, Jiang L. Comparison of Failure and
Complication Risks of Porcelain Laminate and Indirect Resin
Veneer Restorations: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Prosthodont
2019; 32(1):59-65.

Published

2021-09-30

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Current status on clinical performance and main failures of laminate veneers: a review of the literature. (2021). Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia - UPF, 25(3), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i3.12142