Sobrevivência clínica e complicações de laminados confeccionados com diferentes tipos de cerâmica: uma revisão narrativa de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v31i1.18228Palavras-chave:
Laminados Dentários, Facetas Dentárias, Cerâmica, Sobrevivência, ComplicaçõesResumo
Objetivo: Revisar o desempenho clínico de laminados confeccionados com diferentes materiais cerâmicos, identificando taxas de sobrevivência e complicações associadas. Métodos: Realizou-se uma busca eletrônica na base de dados PubMed/MEDLINE (julho-novembro/2025) utilizando descritores controlados do Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) para laminados, cerâmicas, sobrevivência e complicações. Aplicaram-se filtros para estudos em inglês dos últimos 10 anos, incluindo ensaios clínicos e revisões sistemáticas. Uma busca manual foi realizada nas referências das revisões sistemáticas. Após as buscas e aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, foram selecionados 15 artigos clínicos, os quais foram utilizados para leitura na íntegra e para a extração dos dados. Resultados: Os estudos demonstraram altas taxas de sobrevivência para todos os materiais: cerâmicas feldspáticas (87,1% a 100% em até 11 anos), cerâmicas reforçadas por leucita (88,2% a 100% em até 14 anos), dissilicato de lítio (87% a 100% em até 21 anos) e zircônia ultratranslúcida (100% em 12 meses). As principais complicações relatadas foram fraturas cerâmicas e descolamentos. Conclusão: Apesar das diferenças de composição e estrutura entre os materiais avaliados, não houve diferenças clínicas significativas nas taxas de sobrevivência. Discute-se que fatores como preparo em esmalte, execução rigorosa de protocolos adesivos e controle de hábitos parafuncionais desempenham papel mais relevante na longevidade do que o material isoladamente.
Downloads
Referências
1. Armalaite J, Jarutiene M, Vasiliauskas A, Sidlauskas A, Svalkauskiene V, Sidlauskas M, et al. Smile aesthetics as perceived by dental students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):225.
2. Abbasi MS, Lal A, Das G, Salman F, Akram A, Ahmed AR, et al. Impact of social media on aesthetic dentistry: General practitioners’ perspectives. Healthcare. 2022;10(10):2055.
3. Demirekin ZB, Turkaslan S. Laminate veneer ceramics in aesthetic rehabilitation of teeth with fluorosis: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):42.
4. Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM. Main clinical outcomes of feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and complication rates. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(1):38-49.
5. Arif R, Dennison JB, Garcia D, Yaman P. Retrospective evaluation of the clinical performance and longevity of porcelain laminate veneers 7 to 14 years after cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(1):31-37.
6. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(4 Suppl):8S-13S.
7. Klein P, Spitznagel FA, Zembic A, Prott LS, Pieralli S, Bongaerts B, et al. Survival and complication rates of feldspathic, leucite-reinforced, lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(3):601-619.
8. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2018;97(2):140-147.
9. Zarow M, Hardan L, Szczeklik K, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Jakubowicz N, et al. Porcelain veneers in vital vs. non-vital teeth: A retrospective clinical evaluation. Bioengineering. 2023;10(2):168.
10. Alqutaibi AY, Saker S, Alghauli MA, Algabri RS, AbdElaziz MH. Clinical survival and complication rate of ceramic veneers bonded to different substrates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(4):1030-1039.
11. Rother ET. Systematic literature review X narrative review. Acta Paul Enferm. 2007;20(2):5-6.
12. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Schuitemaker J, van der Made SAM, Meisberger EW, Magne P, et al. Performance of ceramic laminate veneers with immediate dentine sealing: an 11-year prospective clinical trial. Dent Mater. 2019;35(7):1042-1052.
13. Smielak B, Armata O, Bojar W. A prospective comparative analysis of the survival rates of conventional vs no-prep/minimally invasive veneers over a mean period of 9 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(3):3049-3059.
14. Faus-Matoses V, Ruiz-Bell E, Faus-Matoses I, Özcan M, Salvatore S, Faus-Llácer VJ. An 8-year prospective clinical investigation on the survival rate of feldspathic veneers: Influence of occlusal splint in patients with bruxism. J Dent. 2020;99:103352.
15. Nejatidanesh F, Savabi G, Amjadi M, Abbasi M, Savabi O. Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic laminate veneers: a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(4):462-467.
16. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Jansen K, van der Made SAM, Özcan M. Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers: up to 10-year findings. J Dent. 2019;86:102-109.
17. Rinke S, Pabel AK, Schulz X, Rödiger M, Schmalz G, Ziebolz D. Retrospective evaluation of extended heat-pressed ceramic veneers after a mean observational period of 7 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(4):329-337.
18. Rinke S, Bettenhäuser-Hartung L, Leha A, Rödiger M, Schmalz G, Ziebolz D. Retrospective evaluation of extended glass-ceramic laminate veneers after a mean observational period of 10 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(5):487-495.
19. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AHL, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(2):171-180.
20. Malchiodi L, Zotti F, Moro T, De Santis D, Albanese M. Clinical and esthetical evaluation of 79 lithium disilicate multilayered anterior veneers with a medium follow-up of 3 years. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(4):581-588.
21. Soares-Rusu IBL, Villavicencio-Espinoza CA, de Oliveira NA, Wang L, Honório HM, Rubo JH, et al. Clinical evaluation of lithium disilicate veneers manufactured by CAD/CAM compared with heat-pressed methods: randomized controlled clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2021;46(1):4-14.
22. Yuce M, Ulusoy M, Turk AG. Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of heat-pressed and CAD/CAM porcelain laminate veneers and a 2-year follow-up. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(5):504-510.
23. Aslan YU, Uludamar A, Özkan Y. Clinical performance of pressable glass-ceramic veneers after 5, 10, 15, and 20 years: A retrospective case series study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(5):415-422.
24. Aslan YU, Uludamar A, Özkan Y. Retrospective analysis of lithium disilicate laminate veneers applied by experienced dentists: 10-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(6):471-474.
25. Yousry M, Hammad I, El Halawany M, Aboushelib M. Randomized clinical trial of zirconia laminate veneers sintered by using conventional versus speed process: 1-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(6):1474.e1-1474.e9.
26. Shi HY, Pang R, Yang J, Fan D, Cai HX, Jiang HB, et al. Overview of several typical ceramic materials for restorative dentistry. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:8451445.
27. Hong N, Yang H, Li J, Wu S, Li Y. Effect of preparation designs on the prognosis of porcelain laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2017;42(6):E197-E213.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Este periódico bem como seus artigos estão licenciados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
