Restaurações cerâmicas multicamadas e monolíticas: uma revisão de literatura

Authors

  • Wilson da Silva Junior Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Priscilla do Monte Ribeiro Busato Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Márcio José Mendonça Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paran
  • Veridiana Camilotti Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Juliana Aparecida Delben Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v23i3.8484

Keywords:

cerâmica, prótese dentária, prótese parcial fixa

Abstract

Objetivo: o objetivo do estudo foi realizar uma revisão de literatura sobre os materiais, técnicas de confecção, vantagens, desvantagens e limitações das restaurações cerâmicas multicamadas e monolíticas. Revisão de literatura: embora as cerâmicas odontológicas sejam utilizadas para confecção de restaurações dentárias indiretas por possuem excelentes propriedades mecânicas e estéticas, é um material susceptível à fratura sob forças oclusais. Para compensar essa fragilidade, restaurações multicamadas são confeccionadas associando um material mais resistente para a infraestrutura e posterior aplicação de cerâmica para recobrimento estético. Porém, as restaurações multicamadas apresentam como desvantagem o possível lascamento da cerâmica de recobrimento. Essas falhas comprometem a restauração funcional e esteticamente, exigindo a substituição da peça protética em muitos casos. Sendo assim, devido a evolução dos sistemas cerâmicos e técnicas de processamento, surgiram as restaurações cerâmicas monolíticas fabricadas com um único material a fim de superar tal limitação. Nesse sentido, diferentes materiais e técnicas são apresentados na literatura para a confecção de restaurações cerâmicas monolíticas. Considerações finais: as restaurações multicamadas apresentam bom resultado estético, porém podem apresentar lascamento da cerâmica de recobrimento. Essa limitação é superada pelo uso de um único material para as restaurações monolíticas, mas o resultado estético pode apresentar limitações. De um modo geral, a literatura demonstra um bom comportamento clínico para as restaurações cerâmicas multicamadas e monolíticas quando a técnica de confecção e o sistema cerâmico são bem indicados.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Priscilla do Monte Ribeiro Busato, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná

    Pós-doutoramento em Odontologia, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Departamento de Odontologia, Cascavel, PR, Brasil.

  • Márcio José Mendonça, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paran

    Doutor em Materiais Dentários, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Departamento de Odontologia, Cascavel, PR, Brasil.

  • Veridiana Camilotti, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná

    Doutora em Materiais Dentários, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Departamento de Odontologia, Cascavel, PR, Brasil.

  • Juliana Aparecida Delben, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná

    Doutora em Prótese Dentária, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Departamento de Odontologia, Cascavel, PR, Brasil.

References

Duzyol M, Sagsoz O, Polat Sagsoz N, Akgul N, Yildiz M. The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between CAD/CAM Blocks and Composite Resin. J. Prosthodont 2016; 25:466-71.

Guarda GB, Correr AB, Gonçalves LS, Costa AR, Borges GA, Sinhoreti MA, et al. Effects of Surface Treatments, Thermocycling, and Cyclic Loading on the Bond Strength of a Resin Cement Bonded to a Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic. Oper Dent 2013; 38:208-17.

Hooshmand T, Rostami G, Behroozibakhsh M, Fatemi M, Keshvad A, van Noort R. Interfacial fracture toughness of different resin cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. J Dent 2012; 40:139-45.

Bindl A, Richter B, Mormann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18(3):219-24.

Zhao K, Pan Y, Guess PC, Zhang XP, Swain MV. Influence of veneer application on fracture behavior of lithium-disilicate-based ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2012; 28(6):653-60.

Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Valverde GB, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, et al. Reliability of reduced-thickness and thinly veneered lithium disilicate crowns. J Dent Res 2012; 91:305-10.

Silva LHD, Lima E, Miranda RBP, Favero SS, Lohbauer U, Cesar PF. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Dent Mater 2017; 31:133-46.

Zahran M, El-Mowafy O, Tam L, Watson PA, Finer Y. Fracture strength and fatigue resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns manufactured with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthodont 2008; 17:370-7.

Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Thermal-induced residual stresses affect the fractographic patterns of zirconia-veneer dental prostheses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013; 21:167-77.

Wolfart S, Bohlsen F, Wegner SM, Kern M. A preliminary prospective evaluation of all-ceramic crown-retained and inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18(6):497-505.

Gomes EA, Assunção WG, Rocha EP, Santos PH. Cerâmicas odontológicas: o estado atual. Cerâmica 2008; 54(331):319-25.

McLaren EA, Figueira J. Updating Classifications of Ceramic Dental Materials: A guide to material selection. Ins Dent 2015; 30:48-53.

Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18(3):86-96.

Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Partm: multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015; 31(6):624-39.

Smielak B, Klimek L. Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching duration on select surface roughness parameters for zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 13:596-602.

Raptis NV, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26(1):31-41.

Anusavice KJ, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:218-31.

Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist - a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 2008; 24(4):433-49.

Ritzberger C, Apel E, Höland W, Peschke A, Rheinberger VM. Properties and clinical application of three types of dental glass-ceramics and ceramics for CAD-CAM technologies. Dent Mater 2010; 3:3700-13.

Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24:299-307.

Taskonak B, Mecholsky Jr JJ, Anusavice KJ. Residual stresses in bilayer dental ceramics. Biomaterials 2005; 26:3235-41.

Encke BS, Heydecke G, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of posterior ZrSiO(4)-ceramic crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2009; 36(3):226-35.

Nicolaisen MH, Bahrami G, Schropp L, Isidor F. Functional and Esthetic Comparison of Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Posterior Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2016; 29(5):473-81.

Makarouna M, Ullmann K, Lazarek K, Boening KW. Six-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24(3):204-6.

Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90(1):31-41.

Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 2. Modes of failure and influence of various clinical characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16(2):177-82.

Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C. Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17(4):469-75.

Fradeani M, D’Amelio M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Five-year follow-up with Procera all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(2):105-13.

Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000; 25(6):459-65.

Olsson KG, Furst B, Andersson B, Carlsson GE. A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16(2):150-6.

Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108(3):239-46.

Bindl A, Mormann WH. An up to 5-year clinical evaluation of posterior in-ceram CAD/CAM core crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15(5):451-6.

McLaren EA, White SN. Survival of In-Ceram crowns in a private practice: a prospective clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83(2):216-22.

Suarez MJ, Lozano JF, Paz Salido M, Martinez F. Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17(1):35-8.

Vult von Steyern P, Jonsson O, Nilner K. Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit (In-Ceram) FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(4):379-84.

Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 2002; 33(7):503-10.

Naenni N, Bindl A, Sax C, Hämmerle C, Sailer I. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results. J Dent 2015; 43(11):1365-70.

Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Philips – Materiais dentários. Elsevier: Rio de Janeiro; 2013.

Conceição EN. Restaurações Estéticas: Compósitos, Cerâmicas e Implantes. Artes Médicas: São Paulo; 2005.

Stawarczyk B, Frevert K, Ender A, Roos M, Sener B, Wimmer T. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016; 59:128-38.

Johansson C, Kmet G, Rivera J, Larsson C, Vult Von Steyern P. Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72(2):145-53.

Sulaiman TA, Delgado AJ, Donovan TE. Survival rate of lithium disilicate restorations at 4 years: a retro-spective study. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114(3):364-6.

Wendler M, Belli R, Petschelt A, Mevec D, Harrer W, Lube T, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: flexural strength testing. Dent Mater 2017; 33:99-109.

Kang SH, Chang J, Son HH. Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAM restoration in the dental clinic. Restor Dent Endod 2013; 38:134-140.

Guess PC, Zavanelli RA, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Thompson VP. Monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23(5):434-42.

Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88(1):4-9.

Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ, Jager N, Kuijs R, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114(1):59-66.

Baladhandayutham B, Lawson NC, Burgess JO. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue load-ing. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114(2):266-71.

Nordahl N, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of dif-ferent thickness. J Oral Sci 2015; 57(3):255-61.

Moscovitch M. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015; 35(3):315-23.

Amer R, Kurklu D, Johnston W. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114(2):260-5.

Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, Ju SW, Seo DG, Jun SH, et al. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. J Dent. 2012; 40(11):979-88.

Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Handel G, Kolbeck C. Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16(3):935-43.

Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109(1):22-9.

Syklawer SB, Janyavula S, Beck P, Cakir D. Wear of ceramics and enamel in artificial chewing simulator. J Dent Res 2013; 92:1902.

Nishioka RS. Prótese adesiva sem metal com sistema IPS Empress 2. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 2002; 56(4):277-9.

Liu PR. A panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005; 26(7):507-10.

Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009; 28(1):44-56.

Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Quintessence Int 2013; 44(5):393-405.

Quinn JB, Sundar V, Parry EE, Quinn GD. Comparison of edge chipping resistance of PFM and veneered zirconia specimens. Dent Mater 2010; 26(1):13-20.

Zhang Y, Chai H, Lee JJ, Lawn BR. Chipping resistance of graded zirconia ceramics for dental crowns. J Dent Res 2012; 91(3):311-5.

Published

2018-12-18

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Restaurações cerâmicas multicamadas e monolíticas: uma revisão de literatura. (2018). Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia - UPF, 23(3), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v23i3.8484