Adherence of TMD and Orofacial Pain specialists to the digital workflow in the production of bruxism splints

Authors

  • Vitória Machado Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
  • Maurício André Bisi Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Daniela Disconzi Seitenfus Rehm Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Karen Dantur Batista Chaves Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v31i1.17956

Keywords:

Bruxism, Digital workflow, Occlusal splints

Abstract

Aim: Bruxism, characterized as a repetitive activity of the masticatory muscles, has undergone significant conceptual and clinical evolution in recent years. With technological advancements, the use of digital workflow in the fabrication of occlusal splints has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the adoption of digital workflow for the fabrication of bruxism splints among specialists in Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) and Orofacial Pain. Methods: This is an observational, descriptive, and quantitative study conducted with 30 TMD and Orofacial Pain specialists registered with the Regional Council of Dentistry of Rio Grande do Sul. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS software, with a significance level of 5%.  Results: The results showed that 53.3% of professionals already use digital workflow, 26.7% have not yet adopted the technology, and 20% expressed an intention to implement it. Despite the positive perception of the accuracy and practicality provided by digital systems, limitations such as high costs, the need for professional training, and laboratory infrastructure still hinder broader adoption. Conclusion: Although digital workflow presents clear clinical advantages, its implementation among specialists remains partial. Addressing the identified barriers could enhance integration into clinical practice and contribute to improved therapeutic outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Vitória Machado, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

    Graduanda em Odontologia. 

  • Maurício André Bisi, Universidade de Caxias do Sul

    Professor da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de Caxias do Sul. Caxias do Sul, RS.

  • Karen Dantur Batista Chaves, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

    Professora do Departamento de Odontologia Conservadora. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Odontologia. Porto Alegre, RS.

References

1. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, Koyano K, Lavigne GJ, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(1):2–4.

2. Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(7):476–94.

3. Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism and sleep disorders: a review of the literature. Sleep Med Rev. 2010;14(2):143–50.

4. Minakuchi H, et al. Managements of sleep bruxism in adult: a systematic review. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022; 58:124–36.

5. Rosado ACL, Albuquerque ICG. Fluxo digital X placas oclusais no tratamento do bruxismo: uma revisão integrativa. [S.l.]; 2023.

6. Rocha Bernardes S, et al. Tecnologia CAD/CAM aplicada a prótese dentária e sobre implantes: o que é, como funciona, vantagens e limitações. Jornal ILAPEO. 2012; 6:8–13.

7. Wada J, et al. Effect of nitrogen gas post-curing and printer type on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed hard occlusal splint material. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(19):3971.

8. Berntsen C, et al. Clinical comparison between conventionally manufactured and additively manufactured stabilization splints. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(5):610–8.

9. Berntsen C, Kleven M, Heian M, Hjortsjo C. Clinical comparison of conventional and additive manufactured stabilization splints. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018;4(1):81–9.

10. Richert R, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595.

11. Ali A. Accuracy of digital impressions achieved from five different digital impression systems. Dentistry (San Diego). 2015;5(5).

12. Ahn JJ, et al. Comparison of clinical fit of three-unit zirconia fixed prostheses fabricated using chairside and labside CAD/CAM systems. J Dent Sci (Taipei). 2020;15(2):239–42.

13. Hall MA, et al. Knowledge, awareness, and perception of digital dentistry among Egyptian den tists: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1).

14. Radwan HA, et al. Digital technologies in dentistry in Saudi Arabia: perceptions, practices and challenges. Digit Health. 2022;8.

15. Fung L, Brisebois P. Implementing digital dentistry into your esthetic dental practice. Dent Clin North Am. 2020;64(4):645–57.

16. Gawali N, et al. The evolution of digital dentistry: a comprehensive review. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 3):S1920–2.

17. Domingues UR. A era digital no planeamento estético do sorriso: revisão de literatura. Monografia (Mestrado Integrado em Medicina Dentária) – Univ. Porto; 2024.

18. Espíndola-Castro LF, Ortigoza LS, Monteiro GQM. Escaneamento digital e prototipagem 3D para confecção de laminados cerâmicos: relato de caso clínico. Rev Ciênc Plural. 2019;5(1):113–23.

19. Verhoeff MC, et al. Updating the bruxism definitions: report of an international consensus meeting. J Oral Rehabil. 2025 May.

Published

2026-06-03

Issue

Section

Investigação Científica

How to Cite

Adherence of TMD and Orofacial Pain specialists to the digital workflow in the production of bruxism splints. (2026). Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia - UPF, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v31i1.17956