Participatory budgeting, inclusion, and digital citizenship
Limits of participation and the effectiveness of public policies in rio das ostras from 2019 to 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v40i2.18441Keywords:
Law and Public Policies; , Participatory Budgeting; , Digital Citizenship;, InclusionAbstract
This study analyzes Participatory Budgeting in Rio das Ostras between 2019 and 2023, examining its institutional structure, its relationship with the Executive Branch, and its influence on local public policies. The research adopts a qualitative methodology based on municipal legislation, reports, minutes, forms, and documents from the Municipal Council for Planning and Participatory Budgeting. It argues that digital channels for consultation and participation can expand digital citizenship when accompanied by inclusion, accessibility, transparency, and monitoring of the implementation of priorities defined by the population. The hybrid model, combining online participation and in-person collection points, has inclusive potential but reveals limitations related to insufficient technological tools, low public engagement, and the predominantly advisory nature of the Council. The study concludes that digital citizenship in participatory budgeting requires not only technological access, but also effective participation, subject to administrative and judicial oversight regarding transparency, inclusion, and popular participation.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Law of Justice Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivations 4.0 International license.


