Longitudinal study of halitosis through gas chromatography

Authors

  • Leo Kraether Neto Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUCRS
  • Jorge Ricardo Schmidt Maas Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas
  • Fernanda Pellicioli Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v24i2.10438

Keywords:

Sulfur compounds, Halitosis, Monitoring

Abstract

Objectives: To correlate organoleptic evaluations (subjective method) and gas chromatography (objective method) for the conclusive diagnosis of halitosis and to examine the behavior of volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) during the clinical management of this pathology. Methodology: Longitudinal study with 19 patients diagnosed with halitosis through organoleptic evaluations (EOt1) and gas chromatography (ECGt1), both applied during the initial appointment. All patients were from the city of Ijuí, located in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. All 38 complementary analyses were compared using the chi-square test of independence. Regarding the clinical follow-up on the effectiveness of halitosis treatment, and consequently the analysis of VSC behavior, four other gas chromatography tests (ECGt2, ECGt3, ECGt4, and ECGt5) were conducted with each patient, and all (95) were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Results: The correlation between EOt1 and ECGt1 showed concordance in 78.9% of cases, indicating a strong association (p=0.002). The evaluation of the monitoring of sulfate compounds H2S, CH3SH, and (CH3) 2S, which are all involved in some phase of the halitosis genesis, showed a significant reduction of all compounds. Conclusions: The gas and chromatography and organoleptic tests are equivalent for the initial diagnosis of halitosis because they presented significant statistical correlation. Regarding the monitoring of halitosis treatment, gas chromatography was efficient, presenting high reduction rates of all VSC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Conceição DM. Bom hálito e segurança! Metas essenciais no tratamento da halitose. Campinas: Arte em Livros; 2013.

2. Laleman I, Dadamio J, De Geest S, Dekeyser C, Quirynen M. Instrumental assessment of halitosis for the general dental practitioner. J Breath Res 2014; 8(1):1752-5.

3. Seemann R, Conceição MD, Filippi A, Greenman J, Lenton P, Nachnani S, et al. Halitosis management by the general dental practitioner - results of an international consensus workshop. J Breath Res 2014; 8(1):017101.

4. Dadamio J, Laleman I, De Geest S, Vancauwenberghe F, Dekeyser C, Coucke W, et al. Usefulness of a new malodour-compound detection portable device in oral malodour diagnosis. J Breath Res 2013; 7(4):046005.

5. Szabó A, Tarnai Z, Berkovits C, Novák P, Mohács Á, Braunitzer G, et al. Volatile sulphur compound measurement with OralChromaTM: a methodological improvement. J Breath Res 2015; 6(9):016001.

6. Alasqah M, Khan S, Elqomsan AM, Gufran K, Kola Z, Hamza MOB. Assessment of halitosis using the organoleptic method and volatile sulfur compounds monitoring. J Dent Res 2016; 3:94-8.

7. Bravo JC, Bahamonde SH. Halitose: fisiologia e abordagem. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir 2014; 74:275-82.

8. Schmidt J, Krause F, Rainer H. Halitosis: measurement in daily practice. Quintessence Int 2015; 46(7):633-41.

9. Dal Rio ACC, Nicola EMD, Teixeira ARF. Halitose – uma proposta de protocolo de avaliação. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2017; 73(6):835-42.

10. Bicak DA. A current approach to halitosis and oral malodour – a mini review. Open Dent J 2018; 18(12):322-30.

11. Calil CM, Tarzia O, Marcondres FK. Qual é a origem do mal hálito? Rev Odontol UNESP 2006; 35(3):185-90.

12. Marawar PP, Sodhi NKA, Paear BR. Halitosis: a silent affliction! Sci Young Cron 2012; 3(4):251-7.

13. Butze JP, Angst PDM, Gomes SC. Perspectivas atuais sobre halitose bucal: revisão de literatura. Bras J Periodontol 2015; 25(2):48-54.

14. Tangerman A, Albert A, Edwin G. Intra and extra-oral halitosis: finding of a new for of extra-oral blood-blorne halitosis caused by dimethyl sulphide. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34:748-55.

15. Tangerman A, Winkel EG. The portable gas chromatograph OralChromaTM: a method of choice to detect oral and extra-oral halitosis. J Breath Res 2008; 2(1):017010.

16. Bicak DA. A current approach to halitosis and oral malodour – a mini review. Open Dent J 2018; 18(12):322-30.

17. Nakhleh MK, Quatredeniers M, Haick H. Detection of halitosis in breath: between the past, present, and future. Oral Dis 2018; 24:685-95.

18. Dudzik A, Chomyszyn-Gajewska M, Łazarz-Bartyzel K. An evaluation of halitosis using oral ChromaTM data manager, organoleptic scores and patient’s subjective opinions. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7(3):6-11.

19. Salvador SL, Peruzzp D, Nogueira Filho GR. Condutas para abordagem da halitose. Bras J Periodontol 2011; 21(3):10-5.

20. Kahn N, Lavie O, Paz M, Segev Y, Haick H. Dynamic nanoparticle-based flexible sensors: diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma from exhaled breath. Nano Lett 2015; 15:7023-8.

21. Kim S, Choi S, Cho H. Innovative nanosensor of disease diagnosis. Acc Chem Rest 2017; 50(7):1587-96.

Published

2019-12-18

Issue

Section

Investigação Científica

How to Cite

Longitudinal study of halitosis through gas chromatography. (2019). Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia - UPF, 24(2), 204-210. https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v24i2.10438