Inhibitory effect of dentifrices on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans: in vitro study

Authors

  • Renata Dos Santos Borges UPF
  • Daniele Canova Maso UPF
  • Patrícia Canova Maso UPF
  • Letícia de Abreu Giacomini UPF
  • Daniela Jorge Corralo UPF

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i2.10634

Keywords:

Dentifrices, Antimicrobial action, Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans

Abstract

Introduction: this study analyzed the antimicrobial activity in seven national dentifrices with antiplaque or antimicrobial substances in their composition, according the manufacturer, on the oral pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Methods: the dentifrices antimicrobial effect evaluation was carried out by agar diffusion test. S. mutans and C. albicans. Padronized microbial suspension was cultured on Petri dishes containing Brain Hearth Agar and Sabourad Agar, respectively. Wells were prepared in the cultured agar and filled with 1:1, 1:2, 1:4 and 1:8 dilutions of dentifrice solutions, and besides positive
(2% chlorhexidine solutions) and negative controls (dentifrices without active ingredients). After 48h/37°C incubation, the microbial growing inhibition zones were measured with a paquimeter and a millimeter rule, being the final zone results obtained in millimeters. Results and conclusion: on 1:1 dilution, all dentifrices were effective on C. albicans and S. mutans, except one with vegetal extract and sodium bicarbonate composition, which did not inhibit S. mutans. In 1:2 dilution, only tricolsan-containing dentifrice inhibited C. albicans, while all dentifrices presented some inhibition potential on S. mutans. There were no inhibition zones for both microorganims in other dilutions. We concluded that C. albicans showed to be more resistant to antimicrobial agents tested in the dentifrices, in this study. S. mutans showed to be more sensitive to tested dentifrices, however, the product dilution during toothbrushing reduces the expected inhibitory action, strengthening the importance of the mechanical removal of dental biofilm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu WH, et al. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol 2010; 192(19):5002-17.
2. Marsh PD, Zaura E. Dental biofilm: ecological interactions in health and disease. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44(Suppl 18):S12-S22.
3. Marsh PD. In Sickness and in Health-What Does the Oral Microbiome Mean to Us? Na Ecological Perspective. Adv Dent Res 2018; 29(1):60-5.
4. Rosier BT, Marsh PD, Mira A. Resilience of the Oral Microbiota in Health: Mechanisms That Prevent Dysbiosis. J Dent Res 2018; 97(4):371-80.
5. Tanner ACR, Kressirer CA, Rothmiller S, Johansson I, Chalmers NI. The Caries Microbiome: Implications for Reversing Dysbiosis. Adv Dent Res 2018; 29(1):78-85.
6. Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res 1994; 8(2):263-71.
7. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43(11):5721-32.
8. Bowden GHW. The microbial ecology of dental caries. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2000; 12(3):138-48.
9. Filoche S, Wong L, Sissons CH. Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology. J Dent Res 2010; 89(1):8-18.
10. Arweiler NB, Netuschil L. The Oral Microbiota. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016; 902:45-60.
11. Rocha EF, Seibel AB, Nogueira NA, Rocha VCF. Envelhecimento humano e desenvolvimento da doença periodontal. Rev Elet Acervo Saúde 2009; 26:e775.
12. Fine DH, Furgang D, Markowitz K, Sreenivasan PK, Klimpel K, Vizio DW. The antimicrobial effect of a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice on oral microorganisms in vivo. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(10):1406-13.
13. Marinho BVS, Araújo ACS. Uso dos enxaguatórios bucais sobre a gengivite e biofilme dental. Int J Dent 2007; 6(4):124-31.
14. Modesto A, Lima K. C, Uzeda M. Atividade antimicrobiana de três dentifrícios utilizados na higiene oral de bebês: estudo in vitro. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 2001; 55(1):43-8.
15. Lippert F. An introduction to toothpaste – its purpose, history and ingredients. Monogr Oral Sci 2013; 23:1-14. 16. Priya S, Uma E, Reddy MKR. Effect of different types of tea on Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2012; 23(1):43-8.
17. Prasanth M. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study. Dent Res J 2011; 8(2):85-94.
18. Valkenburg C, Kashmour Y, Dao A, Van der Weijden FGA, Slot DE. The efficacy of baking soda dentifrice in controlling plaque and gingivitis: A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 2019; 17(2):99-116.
19. Valkenburg C, Van der Weijden FA, Slot DE. Plaque control and reduction of gingivitis: The evidence for dentifrices. Periodontol 2000 2019; 79(1):221-32.
20. Tenuta L, Cury J. Fluoride: its role in dentistry. Bras Oral Res 2010; 24(1):9-17.
21. Magalhães HIC. Efeitos do flúor na saúde humana. Porto. Dissertação [Mestrado em Ciências Farmacêuticas] - Universidade Fernando Pessoa; Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde; 2018.
22. Kidd E, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenics biofilms. J Dent Res 2004; 83(C):C35-C38.
23. Paes Leme AF, Koo H, Bellato CM, Bedi G, Cury JA. The role of sucrose in cariogenic dental biofilm formation--new insight. J Dent Res 2006; 10(85):878-87.
24. Nogueira-Filho GR, Duarte PM, Toledo S, Tabchoury CP, Cury JA. Effect of triclosan dentifrices on mouth volatile sulphur compounds and dental plaque trypsin-like activity during experimental gingivitis development. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29(12):1059-64.
25. Anushree B, Fawaz MA, Narahari R, Shahela T, Syed A. Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Triclosan-Containing, Herbal and Homeopathy Toothpastes - An In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9(10):DC05-DC08.
26. Gunsolley JC. A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(12):1649-57.
27. Davies RM, Ellwood RP, Davies GM. The effectiveness of a toothpaste containing triclosan and polyvinyl-methyl ether maleic acid copolymer in improving plaque control and gingival health: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31(12):1029-33.
28. Putt MS, Weijden GA, Kleber CJ, Saxton CA. Validation of a 21‐day, partial‐mouth gingivitis model for evaluating chemotherapeutic dentifrices. J Periodontal Res 1993; 28:301-7.
29. Van der Weijden GA, Slot,DE. Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: the evidence. Periodontol 2000 2011; 55(1):104-23.
30. Van der Weijden GA, Slot DE. Efficacy of homecare regimens for mechanical plaque removal in managing gingivitis – a meta review. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42(suppl 16):S77-S91.
31. Dhingra K. Aloe vera herbal dentifrices for plaque and gingivitis control: a systematic review. Oral Dis 2014; 20:254-67.
32. Hujoel PP, Hujoel MLA, Kotsakis GA. Personal oral hygiene and dental caries: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Gerodontology 2018; 35(4):282-9.
33. Abdulwahab I, Al-Kholani L. Comparison between the Efficacy of Herbal and Conventional Dentifrices on Established Gingivitis. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011; 8(2):57-63.
34. Marinho VC. Cochrane reviews of randomized trials of fluoride therapies for preventing dental caries. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009; 10(3):183-91.
35. Campos ASC, Fonseca L, Simões FXPC, Juiz PJL. Atividade antimicrobiana de dentifrícios fluoretados sobre Streptococcus mutans: estudo in vitro. Rev Bras Pesq Saúde 2011; 13:4-10.
36. Matos BM, Komiyama EY, Balducci I, Koga-ito CY. Atividade antifúngica do extrato alcóolico de Menthapiperita sobre Candida albicans e C. tropicalis. Rev Odontol Unesp 2009; 38:244-8

Published

2021-06-02

Issue

Section

Investigação Científica

How to Cite

Inhibitory effect of dentifrices on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans: in vitro study. (2021). Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia - UPF, 25(2), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i2.10634