Universal Adhesive System-What is new? Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v26i2.13257Keywords:
Dentin-Bonding Agents, Dental Enamel, DentinAbstract
PURPOSE: To perform an approach evaluating universal adhesive systems, explaining about use and classification, enabling dental surgeon a better knowledge regarding the operation mode of this material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search for articles in the English language was performed at Pubmed/Medline, Scielo and Scopus from 2012 to 2021 using the descriptors “universal adhesive” or “universal adhesive systems”. There was inclusion of laboratorial studies (in vitro), clinical trials, literature review and systematic review with meta-analysis. RESULTS: After a meticulous analysis 53 studies were selected. The universal adhesives are considered more user-friendly because allow both etch & rinse and self-etch mode usage, mostly due MDP monomer or similar monomers inclusion. In enamel selective acid etching before adhesive application is recommended. CONCLUSION: Universal adhesive systems were launched to become the adhesion procedure simpler, however more clinical trials with longer follow-ups are required using this material, evaluating properly its effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion
of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res
; 34(6):849-53. DOI: 10.1177/00220345550340060801.
Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G.
Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV
generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol 2017; 8(1):1-
DOI: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001.
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M,
Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28(26):3757-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044.
Giannini M, Soares CJ, De Carvalho RM. Ultimate tensile
strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater 2004; 20(4):322-9.
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00110-6.
Hanning M, Bock H, Bott B, Hot-Hanning W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged
by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;
(6):464-70. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002. 21326.x.
Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY,
Reis A, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive:18-month clinical evaluation, Oper Dent 2014; 39(2):113-27. DOI:
2341/13-045-C.
Meerbeek BV, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M,
Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin current status
and futures challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28(3):215-35.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability
of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res
; 84(2):118-32. DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400204.
Rosa WLO, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strenght of universal
adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent
; 43(7):765-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003.
Meda EM, Rached RN, Ignácio SA, Fornazari IA, Souza EM.
Effect of different adhesive strategies and time on microtensile bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite to dentin. Oper
Dent 2019; 44(6):262-72. DOI:10.2341/17-338-L.
Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa
M, Cadenaro M, et al. (2014) Adhesive performance of a
multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent
(5):603-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.
Zecin-Deren A, Sokolowski J, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B. Multi-layer application of self-etch and universal adhesives and the
effect on dentine bond strength. Molecules 2019; 24(2):345.
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24020345.
Perdigão J, Ceballos L, Giráldez I, Barraco B, Fuentes MV. Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral
Investig 2020; 24(2):765-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x.
Haak R, Hähnel M, Schneider H, Rosolowski M, Park KJ,
Ziebold D, et al. Clinical and OCT outcomes of a universal
adhesive in a randomized clinical trial after 12 months. J
Dent 2019; 90:103200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103200.
Oz FD, Ergin E, Canatan S. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse,
selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL –
a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 2019;
(27)90:103200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103200.
Takeda M, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Suzuki T, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, et al. Immediate enamel bond strength of universal adhesives to ground surfaces in different etching modes.
Eur J Oral Sci 2019; 127(4):351-60. DOI: 10.1111/eos.12626.
Hardan L, Bourgi R, Kharouf N, Mancino D, Zarow M, Jakubowicz N, et al. Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to
Dentin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Polymers
(Basel) 2021; 13(5):814. DOI: 10.3390/polym13050814.
Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Reis
A, Perdigão J (2015) A new universal simplified adhesive:
-month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent
(9):1083-1092. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.005.
Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J (2013) A new universal simplified
adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent
(1):55-69. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12005.
Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U.
Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different
etching modes. J Dent 2014; 42(7):800-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.
jdent.2014.04.012.
Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite
resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass
ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results J Appl Oral Sci
; 27. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0678.
Siqueira F, Cardenas AM, Gutierrez MF, Malaquias P, Hass
V, Reis A, et al. Laboratory performance of universal adhesive
system for luting CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Adhes
Dent 2016; 18(4):1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x.
Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, Bombarda
NHC. Imediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013; 41(5):404-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.
jdent.2013.03.001.
Zanatta RF, Silva TM, Esper M, Bresciani E, Gonçalves S,
Canneppele P. Bonding Performance of Simplified Adhesive
Systems in Noncarious Cervical Lesions at 2-year Follow-up:
A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent 2019;
(5):476-87. DOI: 10.2341/18-049-C.
Olegário IC, Hesse D, Bönecker M, Imparato JCP, Braga
MM, Mendes FM, et al. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a
pragmatic randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2017;
(1):34. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-016-0260-6.
Cardoso GC, Nakanishi L, Isolan CP, Jardim PS, Moraes RR.
Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using
etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies. Braz Dent J 2019;
(5):467-75. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902578.
Canali GD, Ignácio SA, Rached RN, Souza EM. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled
composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig
; 23(2):889-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2509-8.
Rolim TZC, da Costa TRF, Wambier LM, Chibinski AC,
Wambier DS, Assunção LRS, et al. Adhesive restoration of
molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 25(3):1513-
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03459-2.
Oz FD, Meral E, Ergin E, Gurgan S. One-year evaluation of
a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of
non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases:
a randomized, clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 2020; 23:28:e. DOI:
1590/1678-7757-2020-0311.
Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of
partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive
system/resin cement: results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20(9):2481-92. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0311.
Kosan E, Soares-Prates A, Blunck U, Neumann K, Bitter K.
Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond
strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo. Clin Oral Investig
; 25(11):6419-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03945-1.
Nowicka A, Lagocka R, Lipski M, Parafiniuk M, Grocholewicz K, Sobolewska E, et al. Clinical and histological evaluation of direct pulp capping on human pulp tissue using a dentin adhesive system. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016:2591273.
DOI: 10.1155/2016/2591273.
Matos TP, Gutiérrez MF, Hanzen TA, Malaquias P, de Paula AM, de Souza JJ, et al. 18-month clinical evaluation of a
copper-containing universal adhesive in non-carious cervical
lesions: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Dent
; 90:103219. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103219.
Vidal O, Matos TP, Nuñez A, Mendéz-Bauer L, Sutil E,
Ñaupari-Villasante R, et al. A universal adhesive containing copper nanoparticles improves the stability of hybrid
layer in a cariogenic oral environment: An in-situ study. J
Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2022; 126. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105017.
Sabatini C. Effect of a chlorhexidine-containing adhesive on
dentin bond strength stability. Oper Dent 2013; 38(6):609-
DOI: 10.2341/12-239-L.
Grasel R, Santos MJ, Rêgo HMC, Rippe MP, Valandro LF.
Effect of Resin Luting Systems and Alumina Particle Air
Abrasion on Bond Strength to Zirconia. Oper Dent 2018;
(3):282-90. DOI: 10.2341/15-352-L.
Perdigão J, Araújo E, Ramos RQ, Gomes G, Pizzolotto L. Adhesive Dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations. J
Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33(1):51-68. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12692.
De Melo LA, Moura IS, De Almeida EO, Freitas Junior AC,
Dias TGS, Leite FPP. Efficacy of prostheses bonding using
silane incorporated to universal adhesives or applied separately: a systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019;
(1):3-8. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_144_18.
Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Muñoz MA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating
on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dent Mater 2015; 31(10):e236-246. DOI:
1016/j.dental.2015.07.002.
Moritake N, Takamiza T, Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier
WW, Latta MA, et al. Effect of active application on bond durability of universal adhesives. Oper Dent 2019; 44(2):188-
DOI: 10.2341/17-384-L.
Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Ferreira MM, Marto CM, Paula A,
Coelho AS. 10-MDP Based Dental Adhesives: Adhesive Interface Characterization and Adhesive Stability-A Systematic
Review. Materials 2019; 12(5):790. DOI: 10.2341/17-384-L.
Gutiérrez MF, Alegría-Acevedo LF, Nuñez A, Mendéz-Bauer
L, Ñaupari-Villasante R, de Souza JJ, et al. In vitro biological and adhesive properties of universal adhesive systems on
sound and caries- affected dentin: 18-months. Int J Adh Adh
; 114. DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103107.
Awad MM, Alhalabi F, Alshehri A, Aljeaidi Z, Alrahlah A,
Özcan M, et al. Effect of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Plasma
on Micro-Tensile Bond Strength at Adhesive/Dentin Interface: a Systematic Review Materials (Basel) 2021; 14(4):1026.
DOI: 10.3390/ma14041026.
Costa C, Albuquerque NLG, Mendonça JS, Loguercio AD,
Saboia VPA, Santiago SL. Catechin-based Dentin Pretreatment and the Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive: a Two-year Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent 2020;
(5):473-83. DOI: 10.2341/19-088-C.
Kucukyilmaz E, Celik EU, Ackay M, Yasa B. Influence of blood
contamination during multimode adhesive application on
the microtensile bond strength to dentin. Niger J Clin Pract
; (1):670-7. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.224127.
Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental
adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical
performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019;
(6):2121-31. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34305.
Miletic V, Pongprueska P, De Munck J, Brooks NR, Meerbeek
BV. Monomer-to-polymer conversion and micro-tensile bond
strength to dentine of experimental and commercial adhesives containing diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine
oxide or a camphorquinone/amine photo-initiator system. J
Dent 2013; 41(10):918-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.007.
Souza MY, Jurema ALB, Caneppele TMF, Bresciani E. Sixmonth performance of restorations produced with the ethanolwet-bonding technique: a randomized trial. Braz Oral Res 2019;
:e052. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052.
Tardem C, Albuquerque EG, Lopes SL, Marins SM, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, et al. Clinical time and postoperative
sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs.
incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial.
Braz Oral Res 2019; 33(0):e089. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor2019.vol33.0089.
Josic U, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Radovic I, Jacimovic J,
del Bianco F, et al. Is clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions influenced by
the application mode of universal adhesives? A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2021; 37(11):503-21.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.017.
Patil SA, Naik BD, Suma R. Evaluation of three different
agents for in-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: a
controlled clinical study. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26(1):38-
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.156796.
Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Muñoz
MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2018; 69:60-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.
jdent.2017.09.011.
Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent 2014;
(2):182-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.008.
Luthra R, Kaur P. An insight into current concepts and techniques in resin bonding to high strength ceramics. Aust Dent
J 2016; 61(2):163-73. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12365.
de Souza G, Henning D, Aggarwal A, Tam LE. The use of
MDP-based materials for bonding to zirconia. J Prosthet
Dent 2014; 895-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.016.
Bömicke W, Schürz A, Krisam J, Rammelsberg P, Rues S.
Durability of resin-zirconia bonds produced using methods
available in dental practice. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18(1):17-27.
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.016.
Akturk E, Bektas OO, Ozkanoglu S, Akin EGG. Do ozonated water and boric acid affect the bond strength to dentin
in different adhesive systems? Niger J Clin Pract 2019;
(12):1758-64. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_281_19.
Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess
J. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent
; 43(10):1229-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009.
Ruschel V, Shibata S, Stolf F, Chung Y, Baratieri L, Heymann
H, et al. Eighteen-month clinical study of universal adhesives
in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2019; 43(3):241-9.
DOI: 10.2341/16-320-C.
Oz FD, Kutuk ZB, Ozturk C, Soleimani R, Gurgan S. An
-month clinical evaluation of three different universal
adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in
the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23(3):1443-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2571-2.
Çakir NN, Demiburga S. The effect of five different universal adhesives on the clinical success of class I restoration:24-months clinical follow-up. Clin Oral Investig 2019;
(6):2767-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2708-3.
Carvalho AA, Leite MM, Zago JKM, Nunes CABCM, Barata
TJE, Freitas GC, et al. Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior
of Class I and II restorations of composite resin – a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral
Health 2019; 19(1):252. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0913-3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
