Coronectomy – an alternative to third lower molar extraction

Authors

  • REV FO Universidade de Passo Fundo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i3.13329

Keywords:

impacted tooth; third molar; mandibular nerve.

Abstract

Objective: to report a case of coronectomy with
follow-up of 15 months. Case report: coronectomy
is an alternative treatment for impacted lower third
molars (3ML) which are close to the mandibular
canal, minimizing the risk of sensorineural morbidity.
The technique consists of removing only
the dental crown (at the cementoenamel junction)
with intentional retention of the roots and pulp,
avoiding direct or indirect damage to the inferior
alveolar nerve (IAN). The procedure was performed
on an adult male patient with impacted 3ML.
Panoramic radiograph showed darkening of the
roots, suggesting a close relationship between the
roots and the mandibular canal. At immediate postoperative follow-up, the patient returned with
no painful symptoms, no significant facial edema,
good healing, and no loss of sensation or masticatory
dysfunction. Radiographic follow-up showed
bone neoformation adjacent to the root remnants.
Final considerations: coronectomy has been shown
to be a simple, effective and safe procedure
to decrease the risk of injury to IAN during 3MI
treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Friedman JW. The Prophylactic Extraction of Third Molars:
a Public Health Hazard. American Journal of Public Health
2007; 97(9):1554-9.
2. Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M. A randomised
controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to
the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and
removal of mandibular third molars. British Journal of Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgery 2005; 43(1):7-12.
3. Long H, Zhou Y, Liao L, Pyakurel U, Wang Y, Lai W. Coronectomy
vs. Total Removal for Third Molar Extraction: a Systematic
Review. Journal of Dental Research 2012; 91(7):659-
65.
4. Renton T. Notes on coronectomy. British Dental Journal
2012; 212(7):323-6.
5. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic
findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure
following third molar extraction. Journal of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery 2005; 63(1):3-7.
6. Pogrel MA, Lee JS, Muff DF. Coronectomy: a technique to
protect the inferior alveolar nerve. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery 2004; 62(12):1447-52.
7. Mukherjee S. Evaluation of Outcome Following Coronectomy
for the Management of Mandibular Third Molars
in Close Proximity to Inferior Alveolar Nerve. Journal
of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2016; 10(8):10.7860/
JCDR/2016/20991.8273.
8. Sencimen M, Ortakoglu K, Aydın C, Aydintug YS, Ozyigit
A, Ozen T, et al. Is Endodontic Treatment Necessary During
Coronectomy Procedure? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery 2010; 68(10):2385-90.
9. Leung YY, Cheung KY. Root migration pattern after third
molar coronectomy: a long-term analysis. International
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2018; 47(6):802-8.
10. Matzen LH, Wenzel A. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of
impacted mandibular third molars: a review – based on a
hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
2015; 44(1):20140189.

Published

2022-02-13

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Coronectomy – an alternative to third lower molar extraction. (2022). Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia - UPF, 25(3), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i3.13329