The influence of eugenol on the microhardness of two commercial composite resins
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i3.13331Keywords:
resinas compostas; eugenol; polimerização; testes de dureza.Abstract
Objective: to evaluate, in vitro, the superficial and
deep hardness of two different types of composite
resin when in contact with zinc oxide eugenol
cement (IRM). Method: Charisma® and Vittra® resins
were selected and 80 specimens were made,
40 for each composite brand that were divided
into eight groups (n = 10) according to contact
(immediate, 7 days, 14 days) or no (control group)
with eugenol. A portion of IRM and a ready-made
resin specimen were placed in a dappen pot, which
after setting the temporary restorative material
and removing the placed specimen, generated the
template for making the samples in contact with
eugenol, being stored in water in room temperature
for subgroups 7 and 14 days. In sequence, a
single increment of composite was inserted and
polymerized resin for 40 seconds, generating
specimens that were stored in a dry place to be
submitted to the Vickers microhardness test under
a load of 300 grams, with a penetration time
of 10 seconds. The data obtained were analyzed
by the ANOVA test, at a significance level of p
<0.05. Results: only the Charisma® resin group
that had immediate contact with eugenol did not
reach 80% deep hardness in relation to superficial
hardness. However, for all groups analyzed, both
superficial and deep hardness increased after contact
with eugenol compared to the control group.
Conclusion: eugenol did not negatively influence
the hardness of composite resins.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. de Lima ALX, de Souza PH, Amorim DMG, Caldas SGFR,
Galvão MR. Avaliação do grau de conversão de resinas compostas
fotoativadas em diferentes tempos e potências. RFO
UPF 2016; 21(2):219-23.
2. Boing TF, Gomes GM, Grande CZ, Reis A, Gomes JC, Gomes
OMM. Avaliação do grau de conversão de uma resina composta
utilizando diferentes tratamentos de superfície previamente
à fotopolimerização final. Revista Dentística online
2011; (22):9-14.
3. Nasreen F, Guptha AB, Srinivasan R, Chandrappa MM,
Bhandary S, Junjanna P. An in vitro evaluation of effect of
eugenol exposure time on the shear bond strength of twostep
and one-step self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Conserv
Dent 2014; 17(3):280-4.
4. de Souza AR, de Mello FB, Turbino ML, Youssef MN. Influência
do eugenol na microdureza da resina composta utilizando
sistemas adesivos atuais. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2000;
14(3):237-42.
5. Leirskar J, Nordbø H. The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on the
shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system.
Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16(6):265-8.
6. Moura IR, Rabello TB, Pereira KF. A influência do eugenol
nos procedimentos adesivos. Rev Bras Odontol 2013;
70(1):28-32.
7. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of
eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength
of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 2001; 26(6):556-61.
8. Koch T, Peutzfeldt A, Malinovskii V, Flury S, H€aner R, Lussi
A. Temporary zinc oxide–eugenol cement: eugenol quantity
in dentin and bond strength of resin composite. Eur J
Oral Sci 2013; 121(4):1-7.
9. Sanabe ME, Giorgetti APDO, da Cruz AR, Hebling J. Influência
da contaminação da dentina por cimentos temporários
na resistência da união de sistemas adesivos. Rev Gaúch
Odontol 2009; 57(1):592-9.
10. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials
on effect of dentin-bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res
1987; 95(6):516-20.
11. Benedito RA, Ribeiro JCR, de Castro Mendes FMC, dos Santos
Galvão S, I dAF. Avaliação da resistência de união de
resina composta em dentina contaminada com cimento de
óxido de zinco e eugenol e a sua influência nas técnicas de
limpeza. Rev Iniciac Científ UninCor 2014; 2(2):63.
12. Abo-Hamar SE, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Friedl KH, Schmalz
G. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic
luted to dentin. Dent Mater 2005; 21(9):794-803.
13. Peruzzo V, Coelho de Souza FH, Klein Jr AC, Campos LM,
Macedo RP. Microdureza superficial da resina composta.
RGO 2003; 51(2):112-6.
14. Leonardo DL, Charlton DG, Roberts HR, Hilton TJ, Zionic A.
Determination of the minimum irradiance required for adequate
polymerization of a hybrid and a microfill composite.
Oper Dent 2000; 26(2):176-80.
15. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas NBRNM 188
(05/1999) Materiais metálicos – Ensaio de dureza Vickers –
parte 1: Método de ensaio – parte 2: Verificação e calibração
de máquinas de ensaio.
16. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing
temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems.
Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107(1):65-9.
17. Erkut S, Küçükesmen HC, Eminkahyagil N, Imirzalioglu P,
Karabulut E. Influence of Previous Provisional Cementation
on the Bond Strength Between Two Definitive Resin-based
Luting and Dentin Bonding Agents and Human Dentin.
Oper Dent 2007; 32(1):84-93.
18. Rosales-Leal JI, Osorio R, Toledano M, Cabrerizo-Vílchez
MA, Millstein PL. Influence of eugenol contamination on
the wetting of ground and etched dentin. Oper Dent 2003;
28(6):695-9.
19. Bayindir F, Akyil MS, Bayindir YZ. Effect of Eugenol and
Non-eugenol Containing Temporary Cement on Permanent
Cement Retention and Microhardness of Cured Composite
Resin. Dent Mater J 2003; 22(4):592-9.
20. Cohen BI, Volovich Y, Musikant B, Deutsch AS. The Effects
of Eugenol and Epoxy-Resin on the Strength of a Hybrid
Composite Resin. J Endod 2002; 28(2):79-82.
21. Carvalho CN, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD, Reis A.
Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond
strength using different adhesive strategies. J Esthet Restor
Dent 2007; 19(3):144-52.
22. Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements
on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent
1998; 23:55-62.
23. Silva JP, Queiroz DM, Azevedo LH, Leal LC, Rodrigues JL,
Lima AF, et al. Effect of eugenol exposure time and post-removal
delay on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive
to dentin. Oper Dent 2011; 36(1):66-71.
24. Bezerra CP, Campos CF, Leite J, Fernandes MS, H CSC, Rodrigues
FP, et al. On the understanding of zinc-oxide eugenol
cement use prior to etch-rinse bonding strategies. Indian J
Dent Res 2019; 30(3):424-7.
25. Takimoto M, Ishii R, Iino M, Shimizu Y, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa
T, et al. Influence of temporary cement contamination
on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of selfadhesive
cements. J Dent 2012; 40(2):131-8.
26. Terata R. Characterization of Enamel and Dentin Surfaces
after Removal of Temporary Cement - Study on Removal of
Temporary Cement. Den Mater J 1993; 12(1):18-28.
27. Mayer T, Pioch T, Duschner H, Staehle HJ. Dentinal adhesion
and histomorphology of two dentinal bonding agents under
the influence of eugenol. Quintessence Int 1997; 28(1):57-62.
28. Anfe TEA, Caneppele TMF, Agra CM, Vieira GF. Microhardness
assessment of different commercial brands of resin composites
with different degrees of translucence. Braz Oral Res
2008; 22(4):358-63.
29. Turbino ML, Santos LA, Matos E. Microdureza de resina
composta fotopolimerizável: a cor da matriz experimental
pode alterar os resultados dos testes? Pesqui Odontol Bras
2000; 14(3):232-6.
Galvão MR. Avaliação do grau de conversão de resinas compostas
fotoativadas em diferentes tempos e potências. RFO
UPF 2016; 21(2):219-23.
2. Boing TF, Gomes GM, Grande CZ, Reis A, Gomes JC, Gomes
OMM. Avaliação do grau de conversão de uma resina composta
utilizando diferentes tratamentos de superfície previamente
à fotopolimerização final. Revista Dentística online
2011; (22):9-14.
3. Nasreen F, Guptha AB, Srinivasan R, Chandrappa MM,
Bhandary S, Junjanna P. An in vitro evaluation of effect of
eugenol exposure time on the shear bond strength of twostep
and one-step self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Conserv
Dent 2014; 17(3):280-4.
4. de Souza AR, de Mello FB, Turbino ML, Youssef MN. Influência
do eugenol na microdureza da resina composta utilizando
sistemas adesivos atuais. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2000;
14(3):237-42.
5. Leirskar J, Nordbø H. The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on the
shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system.
Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16(6):265-8.
6. Moura IR, Rabello TB, Pereira KF. A influência do eugenol
nos procedimentos adesivos. Rev Bras Odontol 2013;
70(1):28-32.
7. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of
eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength
of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 2001; 26(6):556-61.
8. Koch T, Peutzfeldt A, Malinovskii V, Flury S, H€aner R, Lussi
A. Temporary zinc oxide–eugenol cement: eugenol quantity
in dentin and bond strength of resin composite. Eur J
Oral Sci 2013; 121(4):1-7.
9. Sanabe ME, Giorgetti APDO, da Cruz AR, Hebling J. Influência
da contaminação da dentina por cimentos temporários
na resistência da união de sistemas adesivos. Rev Gaúch
Odontol 2009; 57(1):592-9.
10. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials
on effect of dentin-bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res
1987; 95(6):516-20.
11. Benedito RA, Ribeiro JCR, de Castro Mendes FMC, dos Santos
Galvão S, I dAF. Avaliação da resistência de união de
resina composta em dentina contaminada com cimento de
óxido de zinco e eugenol e a sua influência nas técnicas de
limpeza. Rev Iniciac Científ UninCor 2014; 2(2):63.
12. Abo-Hamar SE, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Friedl KH, Schmalz
G. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic
luted to dentin. Dent Mater 2005; 21(9):794-803.
13. Peruzzo V, Coelho de Souza FH, Klein Jr AC, Campos LM,
Macedo RP. Microdureza superficial da resina composta.
RGO 2003; 51(2):112-6.
14. Leonardo DL, Charlton DG, Roberts HR, Hilton TJ, Zionic A.
Determination of the minimum irradiance required for adequate
polymerization of a hybrid and a microfill composite.
Oper Dent 2000; 26(2):176-80.
15. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas NBRNM 188
(05/1999) Materiais metálicos – Ensaio de dureza Vickers –
parte 1: Método de ensaio – parte 2: Verificação e calibração
de máquinas de ensaio.
16. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing
temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems.
Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107(1):65-9.
17. Erkut S, Küçükesmen HC, Eminkahyagil N, Imirzalioglu P,
Karabulut E. Influence of Previous Provisional Cementation
on the Bond Strength Between Two Definitive Resin-based
Luting and Dentin Bonding Agents and Human Dentin.
Oper Dent 2007; 32(1):84-93.
18. Rosales-Leal JI, Osorio R, Toledano M, Cabrerizo-Vílchez
MA, Millstein PL. Influence of eugenol contamination on
the wetting of ground and etched dentin. Oper Dent 2003;
28(6):695-9.
19. Bayindir F, Akyil MS, Bayindir YZ. Effect of Eugenol and
Non-eugenol Containing Temporary Cement on Permanent
Cement Retention and Microhardness of Cured Composite
Resin. Dent Mater J 2003; 22(4):592-9.
20. Cohen BI, Volovich Y, Musikant B, Deutsch AS. The Effects
of Eugenol and Epoxy-Resin on the Strength of a Hybrid
Composite Resin. J Endod 2002; 28(2):79-82.
21. Carvalho CN, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD, Reis A.
Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond
strength using different adhesive strategies. J Esthet Restor
Dent 2007; 19(3):144-52.
22. Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements
on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent
1998; 23:55-62.
23. Silva JP, Queiroz DM, Azevedo LH, Leal LC, Rodrigues JL,
Lima AF, et al. Effect of eugenol exposure time and post-removal
delay on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive
to dentin. Oper Dent 2011; 36(1):66-71.
24. Bezerra CP, Campos CF, Leite J, Fernandes MS, H CSC, Rodrigues
FP, et al. On the understanding of zinc-oxide eugenol
cement use prior to etch-rinse bonding strategies. Indian J
Dent Res 2019; 30(3):424-7.
25. Takimoto M, Ishii R, Iino M, Shimizu Y, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa
T, et al. Influence of temporary cement contamination
on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of selfadhesive
cements. J Dent 2012; 40(2):131-8.
26. Terata R. Characterization of Enamel and Dentin Surfaces
after Removal of Temporary Cement - Study on Removal of
Temporary Cement. Den Mater J 1993; 12(1):18-28.
27. Mayer T, Pioch T, Duschner H, Staehle HJ. Dentinal adhesion
and histomorphology of two dentinal bonding agents under
the influence of eugenol. Quintessence Int 1997; 28(1):57-62.
28. Anfe TEA, Caneppele TMF, Agra CM, Vieira GF. Microhardness
assessment of different commercial brands of resin composites
with different degrees of translucence. Braz Oral Res
2008; 22(4):358-63.
29. Turbino ML, Santos LA, Matos E. Microdureza de resina
composta fotopolimerizável: a cor da matriz experimental
pode alterar os resultados dos testes? Pesqui Odontol Bras
2000; 14(3):232-6.
Downloads
Published
2022-02-13
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
How to Cite
The influence of eugenol on the microhardness of two commercial composite resins. (2022). Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia - UPF, 25(3), 429-435. https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v25i3.13331
