TRADICIONAL APPROACH VERSUS BIOMIMETIC APPROACH IN PREPARATIONS FOR SEMI-DIRECT RESTAURATIONS
an integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v29i1.15802Keywords:
tooth preparation, biomimetics, inlay, onlayAbstract
Introdução: A odontologia conservadora e estética tem se tornado cada vez maisevidente
devido ao avanço nos materiais restauradores e à preferência dos pacientes por
restaurações estéticas, mesmo em dentes posteriores. Com o objetivo de aproveitar as
vantagens das técnicas direta e indireta, além de reduzir custos e tempo, a técnica de
restauração semidireta tem se apresentado como uma excelente alternativa para o
tratamento restaurador. Objetivo: realizar uma revisão integrativa da literatura
comparando a abordagem tradicional com a abordagem biomimética em preparos para
restaurações dentárias semidiretas. Métodos: a coleta de dados foi realizada entre maio e
junho de 2023, utilizando as bases de dados LILACS, SciELO e PubMed. Foram
selecionados artigos em inglês e português publicados entre 2003 e 2023, sem restrição
geográfica. Resultados: A abordagem tradicional é pautada em preparos extensos que
demandam um maior desgaste de estrutura dental, assim, a odontologia minimamente
invasiva tem sido preconizada, pois garante preparos mais conservadores. A adesão é um
fator importante para a longevidade das restaurações, sendo importante realizar o manejo
do substrato após o preparo. Conclusão: Desse modo, a técnica conservadora e a
biomimética representam um avanço no tratamento odontológico, visto que permitem
resultados superiores ao mesmo tempo em que preservam a estrutura dentária natural.
Downloads
References
Alharbi A et al. Semidirect composite onlay with cavity sealing: a review of clinical
procedures. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2014;26(2):97–106.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12067
Silveira P et al. Restauração semidireta com resina composta em dentes posteriores:
relato de caso clínico. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2022;8(6): 43058-43078.
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n6-035
Monteiro R et al. Técnica semidireta: abordagem prática e eficaz para restauração em
dentes posteriores. Revista Ciência Plural. 2017;3(1):12-21.
https://doi.org/10.21680/2446-7286.2017v3n1ID11546
Ferraris F. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR): preparation designs and
adhesthetics clinical protocol. The International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry.
;12(4):482-502.
Alleman D, Nejad D, Alleman C. The protocols of biomimetic restorative dentistry:
to 2017. Inside Dentistry. 2017; 13(6):64-73.
Zafar M et al. Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics.
;5(3):34.
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5030034
Fonseca R et al. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and
mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations. The Journal of
Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;98(4):277–284.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60101-2
Hofsteenge J et al. Influence of preparation design and restorative material on fatigue
and fracture strength of restored maxillary premolars. Operative dentistry. 2021;46(2):
E68–E79.
https://doi.org/10.2341/20-032-L
Teixeira E et al. Fracture strength of the remaining dental structure after different cavity
preparation designs. General dentistry. 2016;64(2):33–36.
Al-Fouzan A, Tashkandi E. Volumetric measurements of removed tooth structure
associated with various preparation designs. The International Journal of
Prosthodontics. 2013;26(6):545–548.
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3221.
Milichich G. The compression dome concept: the restorative implications. General
Dentistry. 2017;65(5):55–60.
Bresser, R et al. Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and preparation design on the
fracture strength of indirectly restored molars. Journal of the mechanical behavior of
biomedical materials. 2020;110:103950.
Mei M et al. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a
finite element study. Biomedical Engineering Online. 2016;15(1):3.
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-015-0115-4
Vianna A et al. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress
distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars. Journal of
Applied Oral Science. 2018;26:e20180004.
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0004
Homsy F et al. Considerations for altering preparation designs of porcelain inlay/onlay
restorations for nonvital teeth. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015;24(6):457-462.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12279
Hofsteenge J et al. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the aging and fracture
strength of lithium disilicate inlays and overlays. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of
Biomedical Materials. 2020;110(103906):103906.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103906
Carvalho M et al. Significance of immediate dentin sealing and flowable resin coating
reinforcement for unfilled/lightly filled adhesive systems. Journal of Esthetic and
Restorative Dentistry. 2021; 33(1):88–98.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12700
Saadeddin N, Al-Khalil M, Al-Adel O. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the
fracture strength of lithium disilicate ceramic onlays. Swiss Dental Journal.
;7(132):482–489.
Magne P et al. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations.
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94(6):511–519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
Veneziani M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: updated indications and the
Morphology Driven Preparation Technique. The International Journal of Esthetic
Dentistry. 2017;12(2):204–230.
Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and
onlays. Part III. A case series with long-term clinical results and follow-up. The
International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2019;14(2):118-33.
Falkensammer F et al. Influence of different conditioning methods on immediate and
delayed dentin sealing. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014;112(2):204–210.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.028
Rocca G et al. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays.
Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. The International
Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2015;10(3):392–413.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia - UPF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
