Associação entre classificação radiográfica e técnica cirúrgica nas exodontias de terceiros molares inferiores
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v24i1.8818Keywords:
Third molar, Panoramic radiography, Oral SurgeryAbstract
Introduction: establish an association between the radiographic classification and the surgical technique
related to the lower third molars. Materials and method: a retrospective study was carried out, with the
descriptive analysis of the data. The sample consisted of 100 patients (n = 100) from the spontaneous demand who sought out the Dental Clinic of UFC (Ceará’s Federal University) – Campus Sobral, between december 2017 to july 2018, and who followed the inclusion criteria: patient with panoramic radiography, free of active periodontal disease and tooth with at least two thirds of root formation; and as exclusion criteria: patients with associated bone pathologies, teeth with less than two thirds of root formation and patients who did not wish to participate in the study. Results: patients included in the study were from 18 to 25 years of age, most of them male, with complaints of pain. Using the radiographic classification of Pell & Gregory, the most found positions were 1A (35%), 2B (28%) and 2A (17%). The most prevalent surgical techniques were the open ones. Could be done the extraction by closed surgical technique (forceps or lever) (n = 27), with flap preparation plus osteotomy (OST) (n = 25) and flap plus osteotomy plus odontostomy (ODS) (n = 48). Conclusion: teeth with radiographic classification, grade of inclusion and different preoperative plans had the same protocol (flap + OST + ODS) in the surgical act. It is evident that radiographic classification stills an effective method to aid in operative planning, but it can be complemented by other diagnostic standards, such as a specific classification of the root anatomy.
Downloads
References
Badenoch-Jones EK, Lynham AJ, Loessner D. Consent for third molar tooth extractions in Australia and New Zealand: a review of current practice. Aus Dent Journal 2016; 61: 203-7.
Barbosa-Rebellato NL, Thomé AC, Costa-Maciel C, Oliveira J, Scariot R. Factors associated with complications of removal of third molars: a transversal study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 16(3):376-80.
Baqain ZH, Karaky AA, Sawair F, Khraisat A, Duaibis R, Rajab LD. Frequency estimates and risk factors for posto-perative morbidity after third molar removal: a prospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:2276-83.
Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of third molar impaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Research 2016; 95(3):267-76.
Chuang SK, Perrott DH, Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for inflammatory complications following third molar surgery in adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:2213-8.
Lee CTY, Shinan Z, Yiu YL, Li KYS, Cissy CT, Chun-Hung C. Patients’ satisfaction and prevalence of complications on surgical extraction of third molar. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9:257-63.
Winter GB. Impacted mandibular third molar. St. Louis: American Medical Book; 1926.
Pell GJ, Gregory GT. Report on a term-year study of a tooth division technique for the removal of impacted teeth. Am J Orthod 1942; 28:660-6.
Mansuri S, Mujeeb A, Hussain SA, Hussain MAZ. Mandibular third molar impactions in male adults: Relationship of Operative time and Types of impaction on inflammatory complications. J Int Oral Health 2014; 6(2):9-15.
Osunde OD, Saheed BD. Effect of age, sex and level of surgical difficulty on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015; 14(1):7-12.
Patel S, Mansuri S, Shaikh F, Shah T. Impacted mandibular third molars: a retrospective study of 1198 cases to assess indications for surgical removal, and correlation with age, sex and type of impaction - a single institutional experience. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2017; 16(1):79-84.
Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142:493-504.
Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:771-4.
Stacchi C, Daugela P, Berton F, Lombardi T, Andriulionis T, Perinetti G, et al. A classification for assessing surgical difficulty in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars: description and clinical validation. Quintessence Int 2018; 49(9):745-53.
Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38:964-71.
Hasegawa T, Ri S, Shigeta T, Akashi M, Imai Y, Kakei Y, et al. Risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of the mandibular third molar—a comparative study of preoperative images by panoramic radiography and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42:843-51.
Barreiro-Torres J, Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Méndez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Gándara-Rey JM, García-García A. Evaluation of the surgical difficulty in lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15(6):e869-74.
Uribe S. Radiographic prediction of inferior alveolar nerve in-jury in third molar surgery. Evid Based Dent 2017; 18(3):88-9.
Peker I, Sarikir C, Alkurt MT, Zor ZF. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14(3):71.
Maruthingal S, Mohan D, Maroli RK. A comparative evaluation of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in mandibular buccal infiltration anaesthesia: a clinical study. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent 2015; 5(6):463-9.
Johnson TM, Badovinac R, Shaefer J. Teaching alternatives to the standard inferior alveolar nerve block in dental education: outcomes in clinical practice. J Dent Educ 2008; 71:1145-52.
Ellis E 3rd, Hupp JR, Tucker MR. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2016.
Sampieri MBS, Viana FLP, Cardoso CL, Vasconcelos MF, Vasconcelos MHF, Gonçales ES. Radiographic study of mandibular third molars: evaluation of the position and root anatomy in Brazilian population. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 22(2):163-8.
Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013; 4:e1.
Ruga E, Gallesio C, Boffano P. Mandibular alveolar neurovascular bundle injury associated with impacted third molar surgery. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2010; 21(4):1175-7.
Komerik N, Muglali M, Tas B, Selcuk U. Difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar tooth removal: predictive ability of senior surgeons and residents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72:1062.e1-1062.e6.
Majid OW. Assessment of clinical ability in the removal of teeth among undergraduate dental students: a longitudinal comparative study. Br J Oral Maxilofac Surg 2018; 56(9):870-6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
