Maxillary tuberosity versus palate as donor sites for connective tissue grafts: an integrative review of clinical trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5335/rfo.v30i1.16782Keywords:
Tecido conjuntivo, Enxerto autólogo, Palato, Retração Gengival, PeriodontiaAbstract
Objective: To review the literature comparing the maxillary tuberosity and the palate as donor sites for connective tissue grafts, focusing on the impact of graft origin on tissue volume gain. Literature Review: After applying the eligibility criteria, three articles were included. The mean tissue gain was greater for the maxillary tuberosity group in all studies, with a statistically significant difference compared to individuals who received a connective tissue graft from the palate (p<0.026) in one of them. However, the risk of tissue hyperplasia over time was reported in patients who received grafts from the maxillary tuberosity. Final Considerations: All included studies demonstrated greater tissue volume gain with connective tissue grafts from the maxillary tuberosity. However, based on this integrative review, it is not possible to conclude that this donor site is superior to the palate in this regard. It is suggested that donor site selection be individualized, considering tissue availability, patient needs, and technical expertise.
Downloads
References
Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41 Suppl 15:S123-S142.
Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86(2 Suppl):S8-S51.
Zecca PA, Ronchetti A, Cangelosi D, Reguzzoni M, Farronato D. Histological analysis of oral tissue grafting: a focus on donor site selection. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(9):288. Published 2024 Sep 10.
Shahbazi A, Grimm A, Feigl G, Gerber G, Székely AD, Molnár B, et al. Analysis of blood supply in the hard palate and maxillary tuberosity-clinical implications for flap design and soft tissue graft harvesting (a human cadaver study). Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul 1;23(3):1153–60.
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, RavidàA, Oh TJ, Wang HL. What is the safety zone for palatal soft tissue graft harvesting based on the locations of the greater palatine artery and foramen? A systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(2):271.e1-271.
Stuhr S, Nör F, Gayar K, Cousoâ€Queiruga E, Chambrone L, Gamborena I, et al. Histological assessment and gene expression analysis of intraâ€oral soft tissue graft donor sites. J Clin Periodontol [Internet]. 2023 Jul 9;50(10):1360–70.
Sousa LMM, Marques-Vieira CMA, Severino SSP, Antunes AV. A metodologia de revisão integrativa da literatura em enfermagem. Rev Investig Enferm. 2017;21(2):17-26.
Akobeng AK. Principles of evidence-based medicine. Arch Dis Child. 2005 Aug;90(8):837-40.
Amin PN, Bissada NK, Ricchetti PA, Silva A, Demko CA. Tuberosity versus palatal donor sites for soft tissue grafting: a split-mouth clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2018 Jan 1;49(7):589–98.
Kotsailidi EA, Tatakis DN, Chen YW, Caton JG, Ercoli C, Barmak AB, et al. Comparison of maxillary tuberosity and palatal donor sites for soft tissue augmentation at implant placement: a pilot controlled clinical study. Int J Oral Implantol. 2022;15(4):353-65.
Dellavia C, Ricci G, Pettinari L, Allievi C, Grizzi F, Gagliano N. Human palatal and tuberosity mucosa as donor sites for ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34(2):179–86.
Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC, Kouba A. The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 1997 Feb;68(2):145–51.
Stuhr S, Nör F, Gayar K, Cousoâ€Queiruga E, Chambrone L, Gamborena I, et al. Histological assessment and gene expression analysis of intraâ€oral soft tissue graft donor sites. J Clin Periodontol [Internet]. 2023 Jul 9;50(10):1360–70.
Sanz-Martín I, Rojo E, Maldonado E, Stroppa G, Nart J, Sanz M. Structural and histological differences between connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palatal mucosa or from the tuberosity area. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2019 Feb 1;23(2):957–64.
Garcíaâ€Caballero L, Gándara M, Cepedaâ€Emiliani A, Gallego R, Gude F, Suárezâ€Quintanilla J, et al. Histological and histomorphometric study of human palatal mucosa: implications for connective tissue graft harvesting. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Mar 8.
Ramos-Pilco E, Salinas YC, Alarcón MA. Palate or tuberosity, which is the best donor site for a soft tissue graft? A systematic review. Int J OdontoStomatol. 2020 Jun;14(4):602-9.
Gluckman H, Du Toit J, Pontes CC, Hille J. Hyperplastic response following soft tissue augmentation in the esthetic zone. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2018 Nov 30;9(2):50–4.
Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Rasperini G, Feinberg SE, Wang H, et al. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and periâ€implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2019 Oct 6;91(1):9–16.
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Greenwell H, Wang H. Is a soft tissue graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity the approach of choice in an isolated site? J Periodontol. 2019 Feb 12;90(8):821–5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under aCreative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
