Lenguaje, Unidad y Orden: aspectos de la teoria de la paz social de Hobbes

Autores/as

  • Fabrício Pontin Universidade LaSalle

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/hdtv.19n.4.10489

Palabras clave:

Liberalismo, Representación, Nominalismo, Lenguaje

Resumen

Este artículo busca establecer una relación entre las dimensiones epistemológicas y políticas del trabajo de Thomas Hobbes, enfocándose en particular en el desarrollo de una teoría del discurso y el lenguaje en la primera parte de Leviatán, y la conexión de esta teoría del discurso y el lenguaje con Política y escatología hobbesiana. Al final del artículo pretendo demostrar que, a pesar de la incompatibilidad de la tesis rectora de Hobbes con el liberalismo político contemporáneo, podemos identificar en el trabajo del autor dos tesis fundamentales sobre legitimidad y representación que continúan guiando las demandas de inclusión e igualdad en las sociedades contemporáneas y liberales.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

AUSTIN, J. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined - Primary Source Edition. [s.l.] BiblioLife, 2014.

BAYLES, M. Hart vs. DworkinLaw and Philosophy, 1991. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00127410>

BELTRÁN, J. F.; MORESO, J. J.; PAPAYANNIS, D. M. Neutrality and Theory of Law. [s.l.] Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

BENTHAM, J. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology. Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism. [s.l.] Clarendon Press, 1983.

BRINK, D. O. Mill’s Deliberative Utilitarianism. Philosophy & public affairs, v. 21, n. 1, p. 67–103, 1992.

BRINK, D. O.; BRINK, D. O. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press, 1989.

CAMPBELL, D.; THOMAS, P. A. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined by John Austin. [s.l.] Routledge, 2019.

CHIASSONI, P. Defeasibility and Legal Indeterminacy*The Logic of Legal Requirements, 2012. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661640.003.0009>. Acesso em 15 jun. 2019.

CHIASSONI, P. Kelsen on Natural Law Theory: An Enduring Critical Affair. Revus, n. 23, 10 nov. 2014, p. 135-163.

CHIASSONI, P. Da Bentham a Kelsen: sei capitoli per una storia della filosofia analitica del diritto. [s.l.] G Giappichelli Editore, 2016. v. 103

CHIASSONI, P. Interpretation without TruthLaw and Philosophy Library, 2019. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15590-2>. Acesso em 15 jun. 2019.

COPP, D. Belief, reason, and motivation: Michael Smith’s“ the moral problem”. Ethics, v. 108, n. 1, p. 33–54, 1997.

DWORKIN, R. M. The Model of Rules. The University of Chicago law review. University of Chicago. Law School, v. 35, n. 1, p. 14–46, 1967.

GARDINER, S. R. The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625-1660. [s.l.] Clarendon Press, 1906.

GAUTHIER, D. P. The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. [s.l.] Clarendon P., 1969.

GRAGL, P. Legal Monism: Law, Philosophy, and Politics. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, 2018.

HART, H. L. A.; HART, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. [s.l.] OUP Oxford, 2012.

JOHNSON, E. Pierluigi Billone - PIERLUIGI BILLONE : ITI KE MI; Equilibrio. Cerchio. Marco Fusi (vla and vn). Kairos 0015019KAITempo, 2017. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0040298217000717>. Acesso em 15 jun. 2019.

KELLY, P. J. Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law. [s.l.] Oxford University Press, 1990.

MILL, J. S. Utilitarianism and On Liberty: Including Mill’s “Essay on Bentham” and Selections from the Writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. [s.l.] John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

MORGAN, M. L. Classics of Moral and Political Theory. [s.l.] Hackett Publishing Company, 2005.

MORISON, W. L. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined by John Austin, 2019. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429398018>. Acesso em 15 jun. 2019.

OFFER, A.; OTHERS. Self-interest, Sympathy and the Invisible Hand. Economic Thought, v. 1, n. 2, 2012, 2012.

PONTIN, F. Political economy and the roots of Rawls’ original position. Dois Pontos, v. 10, n. 1, p. 177–194, 2013a.

PONTIN, F. Constituting the political: A phenomenological perspective on political liberalism. [s.l.] Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2013b.

PONTIN, F. “Political Vocations”. Revista Perspectiva Filosófica, v.2, n.40, p. 30-53

RAWLS, J. Lessons on the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2008

RIBEIRO, R. J. Ao leitor sem medo: Hobbes escrevendo contra o seu tempo. [s.l.] Editora UFMG, 1999.

ROSEN, F.; ROSEN, F.; ROSEN. Jeremy Bentham and representative democracy: A study of the constitutional code. [s.l.] Clarendon Press Oxford, 1983.

SMITH, A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. [s.l.] Penguin, 2010.

SMITH, M. The Moral Problem. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1994.

SMITH, M. Ethics and the A Priori: Selected Essays on Moral Psychology and Meta-Ethics. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Publicado

2019-12-23

Cómo citar

Lenguaje, Unidad y Orden: aspectos de la teoria de la paz social de Hobbes. (2019). Revista História: Debates E Tendências, 19(4), 619-635. https://doi.org/10.5335/hdtv.19n.4.10489