The Public Hearings in the Multilevel System of Protection of Human Rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v35i3.13039

Keywords:

Public hearings; Multilevel system; Human rights; Transformative Constitutionalism; Constitutional Courts.

Abstract

The article aims to demonstrate the hypothesis that public hearings are instruments of participation, cooperation and dialogue construction within the scope of the inter-American multilevel system for the protection of human rights, whose transformative articulation is inherent to it. The methodology used in the research was the analysis of content and documental data collected from samples. The results achieved with the investigation to demonstrate the correctness of the hypothesis and make explicit that the public hearings promote the dialogue between the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Courts, the state institutions and the social actors especially impacted by violations of fundamental rights at the national level, and orient the Constitutional Courts to transform into transformative courts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Luiz Eduardo Camargo Outeiro Hernandes, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, PUC, São Paulo, SP

    Doutorando em Direito Constitucional pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (São Paulo –SP, Brasil). Pesquisador do Centro Internacional de Direitos Humanos de São Paulo. Procurador da República. E-mail: luizhernandes.pr@gmail.com    

  • Flávia Piovesan, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, PUC, São Paulo, SP

    Professora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (São Paulo –SP, Brasil). Doutora pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Mestre Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Membro da Comissão Interamericana de Direitos Humanos da OEA. E-mail: flaviapiovesan@terra.com.br

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

The Public Hearings in the Multilevel System of Protection of Human Rights. (2021). Law of Justice Journal, 35(3), 44-73. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v35i3.13039