Procedural autonomy of the Constitutional Claim

Authors

  • Claudia Mansani Queda de Toledo Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES, Brasília, DF
  • Georghio Alessandro Tomelin Universidade Santo Amaro, UNISA, Santo Amaro, SP
  • Paulo Magalhães Nasser Universidade Santo Amaro, UNISA, Sao Paulo, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v36i3.14199

Keywords:

authority, constitutional, procedural claim, courts, procedural law

Abstract

The procedural claim is an institute of the civil process by which the courts of justice can assert the authority of their decisions. This institute emerged from repeated jurisprudential decisions and ended up being inserted in the legislation and in the courts’ administrative regulations. The Constitution of the Republic and its amendments promoted a retracing of its general lines, the usefulness and the legal nature of the procedural claim, now as claim with constitutional nature. The courts gain autonomy to enforce the binding jurisprudence and to self-affirm the nomophylactic function of the Brazilian Courts. The method used here was historical-comparative bibliographical research on the constitutional and procedural moments of evolution of the theme in doctrine and jurisprudence. Thus, this article promotes the re-reading of the procedural claim in the light of constitutional and legal innovations, by which the theme was reorganized after the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Claudia Mansani Queda de Toledo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES, Brasília, DF

    Doutora pela ITE – Instituição Toledo e Mestre pela PUC/SP. Presidente da CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior). Foi Reitora da ITE-Bauru. Advogada licenciada. E-mail: pr@capes.gov.br.

  • Georghio Alessandro Tomelin, Universidade Santo Amaro, UNISA, Santo Amaro, SP

    Doutor em Direito do Estado pela USP. Professor dos programas de Pós-Graduação da Unisa e da ITE - Bauru. Advogado e parecerista em direito público. E-mail: atendimento@tomelinadvocacia.adv.br

  • Paulo Magalhães Nasser, Universidade Santo Amaro, UNISA, Sao Paulo, SP

    Doutor em Direito Processual Civil e Mestre em Direito Civil pela PUC/SP. Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação da Unisa em Direito Médico. Advogado e consultor em arbitragem internacional. E-mail: paulo@mnasser.com.br

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Procedural autonomy of the Constitutional Claim. (2022). Law of Justice Journal, 36(3), 34-59. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v36i3.14199