Outer Space Militarization and the Emerging Paradigm of Weaponization: Implications for Space Security and International Regulation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v38i2.15311

Keywords:

Militarization, Outer Space Treaty, Peaceful Purposes, Space Security, Weaponization

Abstract

The 21st century is not remarkable witness scientific discoveries and invention but also exploration of area beyond the earth. The outer space is the exponential emerging field for the astronomical research and exploration. But it also achieved significant growth from militarization to weaponization the outer space. The outer space is the province of all humanity and global common beyond the exclusive jurisdiction of any State, which shall be used for the peaceful purposes. The various space power has possessed the anti-satellite weapons and further investing on more advance technology to maintain their dominance over the utilization of the outer space. Consequently, although the international framework governing outer space emphasizes its "peaceful use," there is uncertainty in how this phrase is understood, with many interpretations often limiting it to non-military or non-aggressive purposes. In the light of these chronic deficiencies there is a pressing need to address the gaps in the international space regulations to forestall any further weaponization of space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Mohammad Owais Farooqui, University of Sharjah, Emirados Árabes Unidos

    Assistant Professor of Aerospace Law at the College of Law, University of Sharjah, UAE. Ph.D. in Aerospace Law from the NALSAR. University of Law in Hyderabad, India.

  • Tahir Qureshi, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Índia

    Doctoral Student at the Center for International Law Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University - JNU.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Outer Space Militarization and the Emerging Paradigm of Weaponization: Implications for Space Security and International Regulation. (2025). Law of Justice Journal, 38(2), 117-147. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v38i2.15311